Phenotypic integration in three Lamium species’ response to light and density


  • Nataša Barišić Klisarić Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Danijela Miljković Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Stevan Avramov Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Uroš Živković Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Aleksej Tarasjev Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia



Lamium album, Lamium maculatum, Lamium purpureum, phenotypic correlations, static integration


Paper description:

  • The potential for evolutionary change depends on single traits and their relationships. Phenotypic integration is modified by natural selection but can also restrain evolutionary changes and is higher under environmental stress.
  • We estimated phenotypic integration in annual Lamium purpureum and perennial Lamium album and Lamium maculatum during transplantation and under density and light treatments.
  • Perennial species had similar correlation structures and subsequently became more similar to L. purpureum. The density effects in L. purpureum were habitat- and population-specific. Phenotypes became more integrated during ontogeny.
  • Dissimilarities in phenotypic correlations were connected to ecological rather than to phylogenetic differences.

Abstract: Phenotypic correlations were calculated and the levels of phenotypic integration of three congeneric species, annual Lamium purpureum and perennial Lamium album and Lamium maculatum, were estimated. Calculations were performed separately for different stages of development during transplantation under different density and light treatments. L. purpureum exhibited greater integration in comparison to the other two species before exposure to environmental treatments, as well as greater variability in phenotypic correlations in response to light and density. The perennial species possessed similar correlation patterns in comparison to annual L. purpureum, becoming more similar to L. purpureum at later stages of development. The effects of density and light intensity were dependent on the specific combination of factors, as well as on the species under study. Density effects in L. purpureum were also habitat- and population-specific. A greater difference in response to density treatments between habitats than between populations was detected. Overall, phenotypes become more integrated during ontogeny, while dissimilarities in phenotypic correlations among species and between populations were more related to ecological than to phylogenetic differences.


Download data is not yet available.


Klingenberg CP. Morphological integration and developmental modularity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2008;39(1):115-32.

Messier J, Violle C, Enquist BJ, Lechowicz MJ, McGill BJ. Similarities and differences in intrapopulation trait correlations of co-occurring tree species: consistent water-use relationships amid widely different correlation patterns. Am J Bot. 2018;105(9):1477-90.

Klingenberg CP. Studying morphological integration and modularity at multiple levels: concepts and analysis. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2014;369(1649):20130249.

Sultan SE. Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5(12):537-42.

Avramov S, Miljković D, Barišić Klisarić N, Živković U, Tarasjev A. Ontogenetic plasticity of anatomical and ecophysiological traits and their correlations in Iris pumila plants grown in contrasting light conditions. Plant Species Biol. 2017;32(4):392-402.

Tucić B, Avramov S. Maternal effects on early juvenile traits in Iris pumila (Iridaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 1996;201(1-4):179-97.

Damián X, Fornoni J, Domínguez CA, Boege K. Ontogenetic changes in the phenotypic integration and modularity of leaf functional traits. Baltzer J, editor. Funct Ecol. 2018;32(2):234-46.

Armbruster WS, Pélabon C, Bolstad GH, Hansen TF. Integrated phenotypes: Understanding trait covariation in plants and animals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014;369(1649):20130245.

Armbruster WS. Multilevel comparative analysis of the morphology, function, and evolution of Dalechampia blossoms. Ecology. 1988;69(6):1746-61.

Pigliucci M. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Ecol Lett. 2003;6(3):265-72.

Klingenberg CP. Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: tools for evaluating a priori hypotheses. Evol Dev. 2009;11(4):405-21.

Schwenk K, Wagner GP. The relativism of constraints on phenotypic evolution. In: Pigliucci M, Preston K, editors. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford University Press; 2004.

Messier J, Lechowicz MJ, McGill BJ, Violle C, Enquist BJ. Interspecific integration of trait dimensions at local scales: the plant phenotype as an integrated network. J Ecol. 2017;105(6):1775-90.

Gould SJ, Lewontin RC. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc London Biol Sci. 1979;205(1161):581-98.

Gould SJ. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard University Press; 1977.

Thomas RL, Grafius JE, Hahn SK. Stress: an analysis of its source and influence. Heredity (Edinb). 1971;26(3):423-32.

Jaleel CA, Manivannan P, Wahid A, Farooq M, Somasundaram R, Panneerselvam R. Drought stress in plants: a review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. Int J Agric Biol. 2009;11:100-5.

Chapin FS. Integrated responses of plants to stress. Bioscience. 1991;41(1):29-36.

Vialet-Chabrand S, Matthews JSA, Simkin AJ, Raines CA, Lawson T. Importance of fluctuations in light on plant photosynthetic acclimation. Plant Physiol. 2017;173(4):2163-79.

Smith H, Whitelam GC. The shade avoidance syndrome: multiple responses mediated by multiple phytochromes. Plant Cell Environ. 1997;20(6):840-4.

Bongers FJ, Douma JC, Iwasa Y, Pierik R, Evers JB, Anten NPR. Variation in plastic responses to light results from selection in different competitive environments-A game theoretical approach using virtual plants. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019;15(8):e1007253.

Ballaré CL, Pierik R. The shade-avoidance syndrome: Multiple signals and ecological consequences. Plant Cell Environ. 2017;40(11):2530-43.

Huber H. Plasticity of internodes and petioles in prostrate and erect Potentilla species. Funct Ecol. 1996;10(3):401-9.

Barišić N, Stojković B, Tarasjev A. Plastic responses to light intensity and planting density in three Lamium species. Plant Syst Evol. 2006;262(1-2):25-36.

Barišić Klisarić N, Stojković B, Tarasjev A. Genetic differences between populations and habitats in Lamium purpureum plastic response to conspecific density. Russ J Genet. 2006;42(2):165-71.

Kojić M, Popović R, Karadžić B. Vascular plants of Serbia as bioindicators. Belgrade: Institute for agricultural research "Serbia"; 1997.

Day RW, Quinn GP. Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecol Monogr. 1989;59(4):433-63.

StatSoft, Inc. Statistica 8.0. StatSoft, Tulsa, Okla; 2007 [cited 2009 Nov 20]. Available from:

Cohen P, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Psychology Press; 1983.

Rodrigues AA, Vasconcelos Filho SC, Müller C, Rodrigues DA, Mendes GC, Rehn LS, Costa AC, Vital RG, de Fátima Sales J. Sapindus saponaria bioindicator potential concerning potassium fluoride exposure by simulated rainfall: anatomical and physiological traits. Ecol Indic. 2018;89:552-8.

Wagner GP. On the eigenvalue distribution of genetic and phenotypic dispersion matrices: Evidence for a nonrandom organization of quantitative character variation. J Math Biol. 1984;21(1):77-95.

Cheverud JM, Wagner GP, Dow MM. Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns. Syst Zool. 1989;38(3):201.

Pavlicev M, Cheverud JM, Wagner GP. Measuring morphological integration using eigenvalue variance. Evol Biol. 2009;36(1):157-70.

Tomašević Kolarov N, Ivanović A, Kalezić ML. Morphological integration and ontogenetic niche shift: a study of crested newt limbs. J Exp Zool Part B Mol Dev Evol. 2011;316B(4):296-305.

Schlichting CD. Phenotypic integration and environmental change. Bioscience. 1989;39(7):460-4.

Vuleta A, Jovanović SM, Tucić B. Pattern of plasticity to irradiance levels and genotypic correlations between structural and physiological leaf traits in Iris pumila. Arch Biol Sci. 2011;63(3):655-60.

Pélabon C, Osler NC, Diekmann M, Graae BJ. Decoupled phenotypic variation between floral and vegetative traits: distinguishing between developmental and environmental correlations. Ann Bot. 2013;111(5):935-44.

Waitt DE, Levin DA. Phenotypic integration and plastic correlations in Phlox drummondii (Polemoniaceae). Am J Bot. 1993;80(10):1224-33.

Delhaye G, Bauman D, Séleck M, Ilunga wa Ilunga E, Mahy G, Meerts P. Interspecific trait integration increases with environmental harshness: A case study along a metal toxicity gradient. Funct Ecol. 2020;34(7):1428-37.

Palacio-Lopez K, King CM, Bloomberg J, Hovick SM. Natural selection on traits and trait plasticity in Arabidopsis thaliana varies across competitive environments. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):21632.

Garnier E, Laurent G. Leaf anatomy, specific mass and water content in congeneric annual and perennial grass species. New Phytol. 1994;128(4):725-36.

Garnier E. Growth analysis of congeneric annual and perennial grass species. J Ecol. 1992;80(4):665-75.

Holopainen JK, Gershenzon J. Multiple stress factors and the emission of plant VOCs. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15:176-84.

Rehling F, Sandner TM, Matthies D. Biomass partitioning in response to intraspecific competition depends on nutrients and species characteristics: A study of 43 plant species. J Ecol. 2021;109(5):2219-33.

Liu F, Liu J, Dong M. Ecological consequences of clonal integration in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:770.

Pigliucci M, Kolodynska A. Phenotypic integration and response to stress in Arabidopsis thaliana: a path analytical approach. Evol Ecol Res. 2006;8:415-33.

Schlichting CD. Phenotypic plasticity in Phlox II. Plasticity of character correlations. Oecologia. 1989;78(4):496-501.

Krawczyk K, Sawicki J. The Uneven Rate of the Molecular Evolution of Gene Sequences of DNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase I of the Genus Lamium L. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(6):11376-91.

Toji T, Ishimoto N, Egawa S, Nakase Y, Hattori M, Itino T. Intraspecific convergence of floral size correlates with pollinator size on different mountains: a case study of a bumblebee-pollinated Lamium (Lamiaceae) flowers in Japan. BMC Ecol Evol. 2021;21(1):1-13.

Murren CJ, Pendleton N, Pigliucci M. Evolution of phenotypic integration in Brassica (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot. 2002;89(4):655-63.

Damián X, Ochoa-López S, Gaxiola A, Fornoni J, Domínguez CA, Boege K. Natural selection acting on integrated phenotypes: covariance among functional leaf traits increases plant fitness. New Phytol. 2020;225(1):546-57.

Schlichting CD. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1986;17(1):667-93.

Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M. Phenotypic evolution: a reaction norm perspective. Sunderland, USA: Sinauer Associates Incorporated; 1998.




How to Cite

Barišić Klisarić N, Miljković D, Avramov S, Živković U, Tarasjev A. Phenotypic integration in three Lamium species’ response to light and density. Arch Biol Sci [Internet]. 2021Oct.12 [cited 2022Aug.10];73(3):389-98. Available from: